Columbia-backed compliance specialist EmissionLink has warned that falling FuelEU Maritime surplus prices could make compliance cheaper for shipowners, but weaken the regulation’s ability to drive real uptake of lower-carbon fuels.
As the first FuelEU reporting year closed at the end of June 2026, the company said the regulation had succeeded in creating an active compliance market, with shipowners moving quickly towards pooling, biofuel use and surplus trading rather than simply accepting penalties. However, EmissionLink highlights the rapid fall in surplus prices after the main pooling window raises an important question for regulators. If compliance becomes too cheap, will FuelEU still encourage the fuel transition it was designed to deliver?
Philippos Ioulianou, EmissionLink MD, said: “FuelEU has worked in the sense that it has created a market. Shipowners have engaged with pooling, biofuels and surplus trading. That is positive. But if buying compliance becomes easier and cheaper than using lower-carbon fuels, then the regulation risks becoming an accounting exercise rather than a driver of decarbonisation.”
According to EmissionLink’s market observations, surplus prices discussed around €175 to €185 per unit during the busy pre-deadline period moved down towards €120 to €130 after the main pooling window closed. The company said this suggests more surplus may have been available than many expected, supported by long positions, banked surplus and stronger-than-anticipated generation of compliance units.
For shipowners, lower prices reduce immediate compliance costs. But EmissionLink points out that cheap surplus could discourage some operators from burning biofuel or investing in lower-carbon fuel strategies.
Ioulianou added: “That is the danger. FuelEU was designed to stimulate demand for renewable and low-carbon fuels. If surplus is abundant and cheap, some operators may simply buy compliance units instead. That meets the rules on paper, but it does not necessarily move the industry closer to fuel transition.”
EmissionLink believes that FuelEU should now be treated as a live commercial market, not just a regulatory deadline. Prices, surplus availability, fuel spreads, geopolitical events and trader positions can all affect the cost of compliance. Regulators need to review whether the current framework is creating the right balance between flexibility and genuine fuel uptake.
Ioulianou concluded: “Cheap compliance may be welcome for shipowners in the short term, but it should not become a substitute for real progress. Regulators should study the market sooner rather than later, and shipowners should also learn from this first year. Those with accurate data, clear contracts and early compliance strategies will be best placed to manage FuelEU as the market develops.”
Image: Philippos Ioulianou, EmissionLink MD (source: Columbia Group)
